Advertisement

Harry And Meghan's Royal Step Backwards Is A Gift To Republicans

Bill Shorten, when leader of the opposition, promised a plebiscite on Australia becoming a republic if he won the country’s 2019 federal election.

That did not happen but it is interesting to imagine what the result of such a vote would have been.

On the one hand, membership of the chief lobby group, the Australian Republic Movement, has been growing steadily since 2015. For monarchists, however, the popularity of the Princes William and Harry and their young families has been seen as crucial to maintaining the royal link.

This is why the decision of Harry and his wife Meghan Markle to “step back” from their position as senior royals and split their time between North America and Britain is significant.

News

READ MORE

Harry And Meghan To Remain At Frogmore Cottage

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex plan to base themselves at their Frogmore Cottage home on the Windsor Estate when in the UK.

A large part of the couple’s appeal is that they appear relatable when compared to the Queen or Prince Charles. It certainly is relatable for a couple in their 30s with a young family to want to move from home and be financially independent. The catch for monarchists is that much of the couple’s popularity comes from their rejecting traditional royal roles.

The decision of Harry and his wife Meghan Markle to “step back” from their position as senior royals is significant. (Image: Getty)

Harry’s public image has been carefully stage-managed by Buckingham Palace. With his father, brother, nephews and niece all ahead of him, it is unlikely he will ever assume the throne. Nevertheless, he remains one of the most recognisable royals and is key to how the public, in Britain and Australia, sees the royal family.

As a younger man, Harry had a reputation for wild parties and was notoriously spotted wearing a Nazi uniform. His career in the military and his advocacy for wounded soldiers, however, have endeared him to many. His marriage to a popular actor was a further coup for the royal marketing team.

Life

READ MORE

How Harry And Meghan Will Survive As Non-Royals

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have announced they will 'step down' as senior royals to pursue financial independence -- but logistically speaking, what does this actually involve?

World

READ MORE

'No Rash Decisions Here!' Australia's Wax Royals To Stay Together

Though Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were unceremoniously removed from the Royal Family at Madame Tussauds in London, Sydney's museum says they're 'better together'.

The Queen is the longest serving British sovereign, having reigned for 67 years. There has long been concern that her son, and next in line to the throne, Charles, does not share her popularity. Monarchists fear that his reign could spark republican movements around the Commonwealth and even in Britain.

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II recording her annual Christmas broadcast in Windsor Castle, on 24 December 2019. There is no photo of Harry on her desk. (Image: Getty)

The disturbing details of Prince Andrew’s relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have further eroded the reputation of the royal family. As a result, the roles of William and Harry as the public faces of the monarchy are seen as crucial. It is regularly rumoured the Queen may even bypass Charles to give the crown to William.

In this context, the decision of Harry and Meghan to step back and the perception that they, particularly Meghan, have been poorly treated by the royal family is a gift to republicans.

Australia and the monarchy

Australia’s relationship with the monarchy is complex. In the colonial era of the 19th century and the dominion era, until the middle of the 20th century, the royals were seen as the epitome of Britishness. Crucially, Australians overwhelmingly also saw themselves as British.

The most spectacular example of a royal stepping back from their duties during this period was when Edward VIII abdicated in 1936. His decision to pursue a relationship with divorced, American, socialite Wallis Simpson caused a constitutional crisis. Australian prime minister Joseph Lyons concurred with other commonwealth leaders that she would not be accepted as queen so the king must abdicate.

Life

READ MORE

'It's Not Been A Good History': What Happens To Royals Who Don't Want To Be Royal

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have shocked the world by announcing they would be 'stepping back' from their royal duties.

World

READ MORE

Meghan And Harry Left Out Of Preview Of Queen's Christmas Day Message

Hours before Christmas the royal family shared a preview of Queen Elizabeth II's annual address, but eagle eyes were quick to point out that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle weren't included.

Despite the scandal, it was never seriously proposed then that Australia should cut its ties with the British monarchy. This is a key contextual difference to today’s situation.

Harry and Meghan’s decision comes at a time when Australians are talking very seriously about becoming a republic, although recent polling has provided mixed results. A February 2018 poll by Research Now found 52 percent supported a republic with 25 percent unsure and just 22 percent supporting the monarchy.

A Newspoll in November 2018, just after a royal tour by Harry and Meghan, found only 40 percent supported a republic with 48 percent against. This was the first time since 1999 that a poll found more people opposed the change.

Prince Harry and Meghan greet royal fan and war widow Daphne Dunne at the Sydney Opera House in  2018. (Image: Getty)

In 2019, it was even reportedly proposed that Harry might be made the governor-general of Australia. This move would have potentially boosted royal support but was ultimately dismissed.

A Dynata poll in June 2019 then found that support for a republic among under 25 year olds had grown to 57 percent, with 50 percent of those 25-34 supporting a change.

With the future of the monarchy uncertain, Buckingham Palace appears disappointed with Harry and Meghan. An official statement noted “these are complicated issues that will take time to work through”. Reading between the lines, it’s likely the decision -- reportedly made without consulting the Queen or Prince Charles -- hurt.

Gary Nunn

READ MORE

Are Harry And Meghan The Reason Support For A Republic Has Dropped?

It pains me to say this, but as an avowed republican -- the Australian kind, not the American -- my opposition to the monarchy is receding faster than William’s hairline.

Lisa Wilkinson

READ MORE

Lisa Wilkinson: Long Live Harry, Meghan And The Queen, But Australia Should Be A Republic

It’s the second most common question I have been asked all week.

The monarchy has transformed itself over the last century. Issues like divorce and marrying an American (both forbidden for Edward VIII) have been gradually, perhaps grudgingly, accepted. Its chameleon-like nature has let it survive from the age of empires to the age of democracy.

In principle, the issue of a republic (in Australia or Britain) is separate from the personalities of the royal family. Regardless, if Harry and Meghan are seen as separated from the monarchy, or worse yet, victims of it, its long term survival is threatened.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation