Advertisement

NSW Abortion Bill Passes Lower House

A NSW bill to decriminalise abortion has passed its first hurdle after a lengthy and passionate debate in the lower house.

However, proponents of the Reproductive Health Care Reform Bill 2019 face further hurdles as it now goes to the upper house for consideration.

The private member's bill to take abortion out of the NSW criminal code passed the lower house late on Thursday night after three long days of debate and several amendments.

MPs voted in favour of the bill 59 to 31, with many cheering and clapping after the bill was passed.

READ MORE: Experts Slam 'Insulting' Misinformation About Abortion Decriminalisation Bill

READ MORE'I'm Not Ashamed About My Abortion'

Health Minister Brad Hazzard, one of 15 co-sponsors of the bill brought by independent MP Alex Greenwich, urged his colleagues to support the draft laws when he kicked off debate on Tuesday.

"The people's representatives in the NSW parliament have the opportunity to right a wrong that was enacted into law 119 years ago," he said.

"I ask all members to consider whether it is acceptable, whether it is conscionable, that in making this major life decision, women and their doctors have to do so with the threat of being charged with a criminal offence."

NSW Minister for Health and Medical Research Brad Hazzard speaks. Photo: AAP

Greens MP Jenny Leong, another co-sponsor, said she was outraged the bill had taken so long and offended that so many men believed "that they have the right to make laws that dictate what we do with our bodies".

"The sound of men arguing over our personal reproductive health choices hurts my ears and it offends my very core," she said on Tuesday.

Member for Newtown Jenny Leong speaks. Photo: AAP

But several MPs raised concerns over late-term abortions and a provision relating to conscientious objection by medical practitioners, as well as the amount of time given to consult on the bill.

Treasurer Dominic Perrottet, who spoke "on behalf of those who cannot speak for themselves", said supporters of the bill were on the wrong side of history.

"I believe the purpose of this parliament is not to be a platform for the privileged but a voice for the voiceless vulnerable who cannot speak up for themselves. On this issue the supporters of this bill are ignoring that obligation," he said on Tuesday night.

Police Minister David Elliott said the bill wasn't an election issue and the timing had been "completely mismanaged".

"I think this legislation has been ill-timed, has been ill-thought-out and I do believe that if we're going to get this legislation done properly, it needs to be done with lot more public debate and input," he said.